We'll never know but to have 3 flagship lines like the S series, note and Z fold is overkill. They were correct to merge the two since they are both equally the same with the difference being the S pen so make the top of the range S series be the note and flagship camera, then have the z fold later on.
Agree with you they would have had too many flagships. I also feel like they should reduce the number of A's. They also have some M's in countries like India which I believe it doesn't serve much purpose as they are mostly the same as the A's if you check their specs.
I think if they reduce the number of devices that they release their software updates will be much better.
I believe they should merge the A and M and also reduce the number to like three of those like the S.
But I guess they know the market waay better than I do.
agreed... if it was me i would focus on the A2x A3x and A5x.. and leave out the A7x because that will be then taken over by the S series with the low end S2x being the role of the A7x and FE range then have the midrange S the main flagship and the Ultra being the top tier. The Z Fold and Flip would be additionals.
Even in the tablets. Have one low end one midrange being the S8 type 11 inch and have the flagship being the S8+, no need for the ultra
They stretch themeselves too thin and it definitely has an impact on updates. I guess that's the price we pay for Samsung having the highest global market share and wanting to dominate in all or most markets, even though I don't agree with they way they do things.
I hear you my friends. Well on other research i found out NOTE we just expensive while they dont make benefits due to people not buying them while they use tops chips to keep them running smooth and ready for demanding games for those who love high quality games
