Original topic:

Ufs 2.1 vs ufs 3.1 vs ufs 4.0

(Topic created on: 03-20-2025 01:00 PM)
278 Views
lakshyagrover1997
Expert Level 1
Options
Galaxy S

image


8 Comments
royo1e
Active Level 6
Galaxy S
3.1 is more than enough
0 Likes
Galaxy S
I am using my a52s 5g ufs 2.1 or 2.2 with 778g with my s22 plus 5g 8gen1 and ufs 3.1 and s24 plus ufs 4.0 and exynos 2400 and 90 % task opening apps and closing apps nothing seems odd even animations are still smooth on a52s 5g i just cant get when youtubers overhype newwer stuff yeah its better should be but whats the use only 10 % apps use my exynos 2400 at 60 to 70 % mostly some extrmely heavy games lol most apps cant even push 8gen1 to max so 2400 8gen3 and 8 elite realy just bragging rights my phone scores this much or look at my phone gpu is so strong again i ask what is use camera a52s still takes great pics and videos more than good enough for social media
0 Likes
royo1e
Active Level 6
Galaxy S
Ufs number, refresh rate, megapixels these are marketing terms to play people mind. What is marketing, marketing is playing with mind, it's a trick to sell a product. Marketing main purpose is selling products. Nothing else
0 Likes
Galaxy S
😂 true 90 % pepole will even be happy with a52s 5g level phone
royo1e
Active Level 6
Galaxy S
Yes, obviously. A52s is very good device to handle our most day to day task plus entertainments
0 Likes
Galaxy S
Yeah plus 778g was frugal too i feel its more frugal than most new chips since after dsspite being at 6nm new chips are 4nm and 3nm still i feel 5 hrs on 120hz after all these years no joke battery was just 4500mah so not that big lol
0 Likes
royo1e
Active Level 6
Galaxy S
Chipset size doesn't decide how device will be perform. It's all about software. A good software optimization with moderate chipset can gives an almost flagship level experience. Same way a poor software optimization with high-end chipset can ruin experience. All are about software, hardware 30% matters
0 Likes
Galaxy S
Yeah old flagship could give all day battery with 10nm 12nm and 14nm 16nm and even 28nm chipsets some older ones got 65nm and 42nm chips also software those days was lot more optimized
0 Likes