Original topic:

[complaint, feedback] Extremely Disappointed with Galaxy A55 5G Camera

(Topic created on: 03-16-2025 01:50 PM)
247 Views
StickFigure
Active Level 4
Options
Galaxy A
Before purchasing the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G, I had high expectations considering its ₹40,000 price tag and Samsung's reputation for quality. However, after extensive use, I am absolutely FURIOUS with the abysmal camera performance that fails to justify the premium pricing. This feedback comes after thoroughly researching numerous user experiences and professional reviews that confirm my frustrations are widespread.

Camera Performance Issues: A Complete Failure

The camera system on the A55 5G is nothing short of a disaster. For a phone positioned in the upper mid-range segment at ₹40,000, the quality is inexcusably poor. Users across multiple platforms have described the A55's camera as "terrible" and even "the worst camera on a phone I've ever used". This is NOT what consumers expect when paying premium prices!

Front Camera: Embarrassingly Bad

The selfie camera performance is particularly offensive. Despite featuring a 32MP sensor on paper, the actual results are shockingly poor. Photos appear washed out and have an unnatural orange tint. The front camera completely lacks zoom functionality that even budget phones offer. For a phone released in 2024, this level of incompetence in camera processing is UNACCEPTABLE.

Several users have reported that even older, cheaper Samsung models like the A51 produce better selfies. How is it possible that your newer, more expensive model performs WORSE than its predecessors? This regression in quality is a slap in the face to loyal Samsung customers.

Main Camera: Subpar Performance and Processing Issues

The main camera fails to deliver the quality expected at this price point. Professional reviews confirm that Samsung has "messed up the processing" on the A55. The 2x zoom photos are notably worse than last year's A54 model, with obvious noise and a fuzzy appearance. Even in daylight conditions, where most modern phones excel, the A55 struggles with consistent quality and produces washed-out images.

Night photography is particularly atrocious, falling far behind competitors and even budget options from other brands. The camera's poor handling of lighting conditions makes it frustrating to use in real-world scenarios where lighting isn't perfect.

Competitor Comparison: Samsung's Embarrassing Failure

Motorola Edge 50 Pro Superiority

The Motorola Edge 50 Pro, priced similarly, absolutely DESTROYS the A55 5G in camera capabilities:

- The Edge 50 Pro features a superior 50MP main camera with a wider F1.4 aperture (compared to A55's F1.8), allowing for better low-light performance
- It includes a dedicated 10MP telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom, while the A55 offers no optical zoom capabilities
- The selfie camera is a massive 50MP compared to the A55's 32MP, and delivers vastly superior results
- The Edge 50 Pro's camera achieves a 151 photo score compared to the A55's 140 in standardized testing

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Advantage

Even the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro outperforms the A55 5G:

- 50MP selfie camera that delivers far superior results than Samsung's 32MP front camera
- Triple camera system that doesn't suffer from the processing issues plaguing the A55
- It also includes a dedicated telephoto lens with 10x optical zoom. 

Conclusion: Samsung's Blatant Disregard for Customers

I am FURIOUS that Samsung has the audacity to charge ₹40,000 for a device with such substandard camera performance. This represents either corporate greed or gross incompetence in product development - neither of which is acceptable from a company of Samsung's stature.

The A55 5G camera issues aren't minor inconveniences but MAJOR FLAWS that completely undermine the value proposition of this device. Users report having to return to older models or switch to competitor brands entirely. That you would release a product with a camera system WORSE than previous generations is mind-boggling and disrespectful to customers.

I demand that Samsung address these issues through comprehensive software updates to improve image processing.

Please, Samsung this is my third post regarding your worst camera performance 😢😢. PLEASE 🙏🙏 address this issue as soon as possible. Convey this complaint to the relevant team. 

3 Comments
DeepakKatoch
Active Level 3
Galaxy A
Samsung's pricing strategy prioritizes software features, resulting in suboptimal hardware specifications for devices under ₹40,000, even for established users like myself with the S24 Plus. Camera hardware, in particular, remains a point of concern.
SohasA55
Active Level 7
Galaxy A
Boycott Samsung
After buying a55 I feel waste of money,after working hard get this money and they robbed it like that just using brand name and foololing peoples shame on Samsung now they are doing drama with Android 15 one UI 7 worst brand I will not buy Samsung again.
Galaxy A
Yes brooo🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥