A52s5g vs Nokia c01plus - WIFI signal

[Sid_Karna]

So, a phone priced 30k plus mrp vs a budget phone priced 5k.

The A52s5g struggles with only 1 bar of wifi while the Nokia easily gets more than half the bar signal strength!! 

Tells a lot about the quality of wifi modem/receiver used on A52s5g. Well done Samsung!!

[dissosa]

Why you are hesitant about checking the speeds of both devices?? I have heard that network coverage is better in other brands compared to samsung..but for me personally i haven't noticed that...whenever i have had another phone to compare say for example a redmi phone of my friend's, it was my samsung device that displayed better coverage as well as speed..maybe that wont always be the case...Because in the end it is the speed that matters right...from your words it seems like u have already checked the speeds of both devices and your samsung device came out on top..is that why u r not showing the speed comparison?

[Anonymous]

Lmao, why he's even obliged to give you proof? You're making nonsensical hypothesis and can't digest the flaws of Samsung as you're a samsung fanboy.First with the Android version, then with alleging that network is **bleep**, even if he gives the speed result, you'll come up with another hypothesis.

[Anonymous]

Bro who said I am fan boy? If I ask for proof I am fan boy? And sorry bro I don't believe that person because he is just saying I am fan boy but I never said him I am fan boy

[Anonymous]

@dissosa

Dissosa....toxic fanboyism.....lies.

[Kunal2]

Yes thats true. Samsung phones has less coverage of wifi n mobile network signal. Even 10k rs oppo n mi phones catches all wifi router signals of my neighbors but mine a52s and s7 edge struggling to catch my home router in bedroom. Samsung phones r always having this signal strenght issues from starting n users r always complaining about this issue in all the platform but no improvement till date from samsung. That's sad

[Sid_Karna]

Yup, I have also observed this trend on Samsung devices. But this time I was surprised because this is a 5k device performing better than a 30k device!

[Gst26]

Its Very true...that Samu's Phones are bit Compromised in terms of Network Strength..I have personally observed with Note9 & now with S22ULTRA in fact if i am not wrong i have shared live video of Note9 Vs Asus Zenfone Laser3 in 2019..where zenfone Shown 1-2Mbps more data speed at my home location with Same operator in same room and this i observed many times...Now same with S22ULTRA vs Lava Agni5G, where in my home town there is a network issue with Ai**el both reflects 1-2 bars with Fluctuations...And more calls with voice distortion & Call disconnecting with S22ULTRA & that too when i am using premium Postpaid Plan while on Lava Agni5G it is pre-paid with family member... tried Vice-Versa then also S22ULTRA on lower hand....But i have never got opportunity to Compare with Poor wifi Signal Comparison but if it is what mentioned by you then it is confirmed that they are Bit Compromised in terms of Signal Reception quality..

[Sid_Karna]

Thanks for the detailed comment man. Sometimes, it's pretty annoying to deal with some fanboys. I hope they will read this comment.

[Sid_Karna]

You have made a post about the Lava phone here in the last 6 months, right? I remember reading it.

[Gst26]

But it was related to the image quality & not about network related..Here also the difference in image quality won't justify 85-90k amount difference at all..
https://r2.community.samsung.com/t5/Galaxy-Gallery/Testing-image-Quality-of-S22ULTRA-vs-19K-Phone-Ni...