1st: in-display fingerprint reader is so bad on my galaxy A50 that I do not want to try note 10 plus where in the ultrasonic one also struggles as per youtubers. I have to call a lot of people during office hours and my phone never opens instantly.
Cheap phones like oppo - vivo in-display fingerprint open in a flash! Samsung should either learn from them or get back to physical fingerprint reader on their phones which was faster, secure & convenient.
2nd: Why Samsumg flagships come with Exynos chip when everyone knows it's such a trash? Why snapdragon only in US? That too because in US only CDMA works otherwise Samsung would have pasted Exynos chip there too.
I am using S10 and in mine in display sensor is very fast. Don't believe anything from YouTube. Bro you are wrong I think you are aware that Qualcomm is US company and Qualcomm has patented to use their chips only in US so that except snapdragon they can't use any other chips if they want to use exynos in US Samsung has to pay high royalty amount to Qualcomm and the phone becomes expensive. That's the reason. Also exynos processors are very good. Pls do the research properly and post.
Exynos is good but not as efficient as snapdragon bro, imagine u pay the same amount as in US still your performance differs. while at start exynos is good for daily tasks like opening apps a little bit of multi tasking but for gaming, battery efficiency, heat management it **bleep**. People are not fool here to bash exynos for no reason..
Well bro I am not sure how your exynos for A50 performs mine is flagship rite it's very fast didn't face any issue with that and mine is ultrasonic fingerprint sensor so it might vary with your optical sensor.
Please register your concern in Samsung Members Application (Open Samsung Members Application > Get help > Send Feedback > Error report/Ask questions).
