<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Question about ROM in Tech Talk</title>
    <link>https://r2.community.samsung.com/t5/Tech-Talk/Question-about-ROM/m-p/3587041#M43630</link>
    <description>As far as i know ROM (i.e Read only memory) whis can store data for 1 time after that it converts into non written able memory only special kind of rom can allow multiple write process (i.e EEPROM). mobile maker company use to say ROM is 32 gb or 64 etc. It'd proper if there use 'internal memory' instead of saying ROM.&amp;nbsp;&lt;DIV&gt;My question why 'ROM' the word more preferred?&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:21:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>soyel05</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-28T16:21:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question about ROM</title>
      <link>https://r2.community.samsung.com/t5/Tech-Talk/Question-about-ROM/m-p/3587041#M43630</link>
      <description>As far as i know ROM (i.e Read only memory) whis can store data for 1 time after that it converts into non written able memory only special kind of rom can allow multiple write process (i.e EEPROM). mobile maker company use to say ROM is 32 gb or 64 etc. It'd proper if there use 'internal memory' instead of saying ROM.&amp;nbsp;&lt;DIV&gt;My question why 'ROM' the word more preferred?&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:21:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://r2.community.samsung.com/t5/Tech-Talk/Question-about-ROM/m-p/3587041#M43630</guid>
      <dc:creator>soyel05</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-28T16:21:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

